Table of Contents

Project 14:

Towards Correlation of Clinical Outcomes with Radiation Therapy Dose Distribution

Last updated: 05/5/16 at 1:00PM

Summary

Correlate clinical outcomes with refined dose distributions on critical structures

Goals:

Students: Alex Mathews, Pranav Lakshminarayanan

Mentor(s): Dr. Todd McNutt, Dr. Russell Taylor

Background and Significance

With cancer treatments, there is a tradeoff between clinical effectiveness and deleterious side effects.

The ability to predict clinical outcomes for a particular patient (taking into account unique anatomy and condition) would allow oncologists to make more informed decisions regarding patient treatment plans.

Deliverables

Technical Approach

The steps to achieve our goals are as follows: 1. Set up a development database within the Hopkins network

2. Deformable registration of critical structures

3. Dose distribution mapping

Dependencies

Access to Oncospace database

Access to space on Hopkins network

Github repositories and access to Oncospace codebase

Milestones and Status

Projected Timeline:

Milestones:

  1. Obtain and set up server
    • Planned Date: March 12
    • Status: In progress
  2. Infrastructure and endpoint documentation
    • Planned Date: March 19
    • Status: In progress
  3. Data transfer from Oncospace database
    • Planned Date: March 27
    • Status: Planned
  4. Implement deformable registration algorithm on test data
    • Planned Date: March 27
    • Status: In progress
  5. Implement deformable registration on full dataset
    • Planned Date: April 17
    • Status: Planned
  6. Implement dose mapping algorithm on full dataset
    • Planned Date: April 30
    • Status: Planned

Reports and presentations

Project Bibliography

Bentzen, S. M., Constine, L. S., Deasy, J. O., Eisbrunch, A., Jackson, A., Marks, L. B., Haken, R. K. T., & Yorke, E. D. (2010). Quantitative analysis of normal tissue effects in the clinic (QUANTEC): An introduction to the scientific issues. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 76(3), S3–S9.

Bhide SA, Newbold KL, Harrington KJ, Nutting CM. Clinical evaluation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. The British Journal of Radiology. 2012;85(1013):487-494. doi:10.1259/bjr/85942136.

Fumbeya Marungo, Hilary Paisley, John Rhee, Todd McNutt, Scott Robertson, Russell Taylor, “Big Data Meets Medical Physics Dosimetry” (2014)

Kutcher, G., Burman, C., Brewster, L., Goitein, M., & Mohan, R. (1991). Histogram re- duction method for calculating complication probabilities for three-dimensional treatment planning evaluations. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, 21(1), 137–146.

Michael Kazhdan, Patricio Simari, Todd McNutt, Binbin Wu, Robert Jacques, Ming Chuang, and Russell Taylor, “A Shape Relationship Descriptor for RadiationTherapy Planning” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 5762/2009(12), 100–108 (2009)

Steven F. Petit, Binbin Wu, Michael Kazhdan , André Dekker, Patricio Simari, Rachit Kumar, Russell Taylor, Joseph M. Herman, Todd McNutt,” Increased organ sparing using shape-based treatment plan optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma”, Radiotherapy and Oncology, 102 (2012) 38–44.

Other Resources and Project Files

Coming soon…